Francisco Cruz

Francisco Cruz

Doctoral Student

University of Lisbon

About

Francisco Cruz is a doctoral student in social psychology at the Faculty of Psychology, University of Lisbon, under the supervision of Prof. André Mata (University of Lisbon) and Prof. Tania Lombrozo (Princeton University). His project explores why people are sceptical of psychology as a science, as well as how to increase trust in psychological science.

His research interests include lay beliefs about science (i.e., what people believe that science can or cannot explain and why), motivated beliefs in science (i.e., the contexts in which people are more prone to accepting scientific explanations), representation of social groups (i.e., how people integrate information to provide judgments on shared homogeneity vs. heterogeneity across group members), epistemic trespassing (i.e., when people provide judgments on domains beyond those in which they are experts), intuitive mind-body dualism (i.e., a natural tendency to see the world as split in material and immaterial portions), and face perception (i.e., features driving the advantage in recall for own- vs. other-race faces).

He is a Student Affiliate at the Center for the Science of Moral Understanding, an Editor at the Journal of European Psychology Students, and an Opinion Editor at Cruamente.

Download my CV .

Interests
  • Social Psychology
  • Social Cognition
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Experimental Philosophy
Education
  • PhD in Social Psychology, Ongoing

    Faculty of Psychology - University of Lisbon

  • PgDip in Data Analysis in Social Sciences, 2022

    School of Sociology and Public Policy - Iscte

  • MSc in Applied Social Cognition, 2021

    Faculty of Psychology - University of Lisbon

  • ERASMUS+ Programme in Psychology, 2018

    Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences - University of Groningen

  • BSc in Psychology, 2018

    Faculty of Psychology - University of Lisbon

Research Interests

Lay Beliefs about Science
This research interest revolves around why people believe that some psychological phenomena are more explainable than others. Furthermore, we address the nature of these beliefs, as well as their malleability, namely under contexts in which people are motivated to reach a desired conclusion or after exposure to formal scientific training opportunities. This project seeks to inform policies, by designing interventions dedicated to dismantling scepticism towards (psychological) science.
Lay Beliefs about Science
Word and Face Processing
My research interest here lies in the underlying mechanisms - such as holistic processing of visual stimuli - enabling fast and accurate identification of frequently-exposed-to objects, namely words and faces. Moreover, I also explore the how’s and why’s behind the cross-race effect - the tendency for people to more accurately recall faces belonging to their ethnicity (vs. faces from other ethnicities).
Word and Face Processing
Temporal Outgroups
Thinking of our social groups in the past (e.g., our compatriots in 1922) changes the way we perceive them as a social category, namely by leading us to believe that the group members are more similar to one another than its present members are. In this project, we address the potentially relevant psychological mechanisms promoting differential beliefs about the homogeneity of closely related social groups.
Temporal Outgroups

Publications

(2023). The effect of pre-event instructions on eyewitness identification. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 8(1).

PDF Cite DOI

(2022). The mechanisms supporting holistic perception of words and faces are not independent. Memory & Cognition (1).

PDF Cite DOI

(2022). Do individuation instructions reduce the cross-race effect? A registered replication of Hugenberg, Miller, and Claypool (2007). Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 104(1).

PDF Cite DOI

(2022). The relation between holistic processing as measured by three composite tasks and face processing: A latent variable modeling approach. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 84(5).

PDF Cite DOI

(2022). Partial overlap between holistic processing of words and Gestalt line stimuli at an early perceptual stage. Memory & Cognition, 50(1).

PDF Cite DOI

(2022). Change detection vs. change localization for own-race and other-race faces. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 84(3).

PDF Cite DOI

(2020). Further evidence for a late locus of holistic word processing: Exploring vertex effect in the word composite task. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 82(7).

PDF Cite DOI

Certifications

Social Psychology
How to Write and Publish a Scientific Paper
Data Science - R Basics
Probability and Statistics - To p or not to p?
Introduction to Philosophy

Awards

2020-2021 Merit Scholarship
Best Conference Presentation (3rd place)

Contact